Terms of Service

 John Vahlenkamp: Longmont Times-Call John Vahlenkamp, Managing Editor threatens Longmont, CO homeowner regarding criticism of proven falsified and libelous article by P.J. Shields, Pierette J. Shields, published in the Longmont Times-Call.

After publishing falsified/ libelous articles by Pierette J. Shields, Longmont Times-Call Managing Editor John Vahlenkamp, threatened lawsuit for “fair use” of images of offending reporters.

Viewing this website assumes your acceptance of the below shown, and all applicable laws. If you do not accept these terms, please LEAVE. If you’re a government official who does not like this website, or you’re suffering from, “hurt feelings” because you have participated in the criminal conspiracy described on this website. Tough shit.

All statements and allegations are known to be true, and supported by sworn testimony and the record of the Court. All statements are made in good faith, and for the specific purpose such that the People of the State of Colorado shall effect the removal of the named corrupt individuals from their official positions. As grievous Constitutional Rights Violations are at issue, it is the duty of, and in the interest of the People of the State of Colorado to hear and act upon the information contained in this website. Many of the government actors named on this website are elected officials: YOU have the power to terminate their careers.

 

Individuals claiming breach of “fair use” of images, or “defamatory” content are welcome to use the Contact Page to submit an evidenced complaint according to the terms of that page.

First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States – Religion and Expression. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

17 U.S. Code § 107 – Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use – Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;

(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

The subject of “defamatory content” vs. hurt feelings” is extensively covered in this article about Attorney Caroline R. Kert from The Law Offices of Daniel T. Goodwin, 10901 W 120th Ave #350, Broomfield, CO 80021.
John Vahlenkamp Longmont Times-Call & Boulder Daily Camera Managing Editor threatens lawsuit over victim's criticism of falsified newspaper articles.

John Vahlenkamp Longmont Times-Call & Boulder Daily Camera Managing Editor threatens lawsuit over victim’s criticism of falsified newspaper articles.

Similarly situated victims of government and media corruption need not fear retaliation for publicizing provable FACTS, nor for using a copyrighted image of the offending parties. View Longmont, CO homeowner Craig Buckley’s Cease & Desist to Longmont Times-Call & Boulder Daily Camera Managing Editor John Vahlenkamp.

Official Court Order Regarding The Contents of This Website:

“I have great respect for Mr. Buckley’s First Amendment right to free expression. Part of my job is to protect his, and others’ constitutional rights, and I take that responsibility seriously. I have no problem at all with him expressing his feelings of frustration and even anger at me or the legal system, whether those statements are made on his website or otherwise. Transparency of the judicial process is of paramount importance and an integral part of maintaining transparency is allowing people to voice their opinions – negative or positive – of judges and their decisions.” – Weld County District Court Chief Judge James F. Hartmann – March 13, 2013 Order of the Weld County District Court.