Judge Andrew Hartman Conceals Multiple Felonies By Weld County District Court Chief Judge James Hartmann. Should Andrew Hartman Be Jailed?
Judge Andrew Hartmann knows:
Under Federal Law, 18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of treason is defined as follows:
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Sept. 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), 108 Stat. 2147.)
Boulder County district Court Judge Andrew Hartmann presided over People v. Buckley, a Felony “Retaliation Against a Judge” case brought against Longmont, CO homeowner Craig Buckley as a result of a civil contempt arrest, related to a wage claim lawsuit Buckley had filed in 2009 against his employers.
In 2013, the Weld County District Court, under the authority of Chief Judge James Hartmann, raided Buckley’s home, and had him incarcerated for contempt of Court, for refusing to give the deed to his house to his former employers. Ten days later, Longmont Police again illegally raided Buckley’s home, and incarcerated him on the Felony charge for alleged “threatening” statements he was purported to have made against Judge James Hartmann during the first arrest.
Both arrests, according to legal analysts, were illegal.
As evidenced throughout this website, Judge James Hartmann’s rulings in the civil matter against Buckley’s former employers were void, as Hartmann repeatedly and maliciously violated Buckley’s Due process Rights.
Judgment is a void judgment if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process, Fed Rules Civ. Proc., Rule 60(b)(4), 28 U.S.C.A.; U.S.C.A. Const Amend. 5. Klugh v. U.S., 620 F. Supp. 892 (D.S.C. 1985).
On April 21, 2014 Judge James Hartmann testified against Buckley. Hartmann’s testimony was, in whole, perjured. Buckley’s defense attorney, Michael Root, made no attempt to undermine the credibility of Hartmann’s testimony, knowing that if he did anything to embarrass the Judge, he would likely never be able to practice law in Colorado again.
Buckley was found guilty of “Retaliation Against a Judge” on April 2, 2014. Analysis of the evidence leading up to the felony charge, and the transcript of sworn testimony by Judge James Hartmann, on April 21, 2014, indicate the trial was a, “sham”.
Defense Attorney Michael Root was fired by Buckley on April 22, 2014 for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel amid allegations of subornation of Judge James Hartmann’s proven perjured testimony.
Prior to sentencing, which occurred July 18, 2014, Buckley took over the case and submitted several fully exhibited Motions to Judge Andrew Hartman. The evidence presented to Judge Andrew Hartmann proved that Boulder County District Attorney Stan Garnett had not only known of criminal activity by Judge James Hartmann since April 2011, but had suborned felony perjury, and obstructed justice in Buckley’s April 2014 trial.
People who do not want proof that upstanding citizen, “The Honorable” Judge James F. Hartmann is a felon, should probably not read the Court documents presented here:
“Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States, wars against that Constitution and engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.” “U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)”
The irrefutable evidence of multiple felony acts committed over a 4 year period by Judge James Hartmann, and his obstruction of justice and perjured testimony on April 21, 2014 was sufficient to trigger Judge Andrew Hartmann’s obligation to report: under The Colorado Rules of Judicial Conduct (Judicial Canon), under The Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct, and persuant Judge Andrew Hartmann’s sworn duty under 18 U.S. Code § 2382.
He did not. In fact, Corrupt Andrew Hartmann responded to clear, convincing proof of Judge James Hartmann’s multiple felony acts by ruling, “The allegations against Judge James Hartmann, even if true, are not material to this case”.
Buckley stated, “So, corrupt Boulder County District Court Judge Andrew Hartman has essentially said that James Hartmann can commit any criminal acts he sees fit, with total impunity. Is that what I’m hearing, here? That sounds about right.”
Buckley, throughout his pro-se Motions following the criminal trial, continually alleged Constitutional Rights violations and demanded a hearing, per DeBaca v. People, 170 Colo. 415, 462 P.2d 496 (1969).
Corrupt Judge Andrew Hartmann flatly refused Buckley a hearing based on Constitutional Rights grounds.
According to the .pdf evidence linked to this post, Judge Andrew Hartman has personal knowledge, not only of the perjured testimony sworn into the Record of the Court April 21, 2014 by known felon James F. Hartmann, but also proof of a pattern and practice of criminal activity dating to April 2011.
Judge Andrew Hartman has chosen to conceal crime by his colleague, and continue victimizing Longmont, CO homeowner Craig Buckley. Should Corrupt Judge Andrew Hartman be jailed, pursuant to 18 U.S. Code § 2382? The LAW says, “Yes”.