DA Stan Garnett :: Boulder County DA Refuses to Produce Evidence Corroborating Known Perjured Testimony in Retaliation Trial (Corrupt Stan Garnett – Part 1 of a multi-part series).
As evidence has shown, DA Stan Garnett, Boulder County, Colorado District Attorney is arguably Colorado’s most corrupt DA. DA Stan Garnett has made critical, hopefully career-ending mistakes: among them, communicating directly with a wrongfully convicted criminal Defendant. Hartmannconspiracy.com is poised to aggressively exploit Stan Garnett’s arrogance, and total disregard for the law.
Nearly 3 years before he was to stand trial for Retaliation Against a Judge, Longmont, Colorado homeowner Craig Buckley sent Boulder County DA Stan Garnett an evidence pack irrefutably proving Weld County District Court Chief Judge James F. Hartmann’s involvement in multiple felonies committed by civil Defendants in Hartmann’s Courtroom. After having been caught in crime, Hartmann had provably aided, abetted, compounded, and enlisted the assistance of other Colorado government officials to wage a years-long attack on Buckley, in violation of Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 & 242. DA Stan Garnett turned a blind eye to the irrefutable proof of felonious conduct by his colleague, Judge James F. Hartmann.
Buckley, in a civil action captioned Buckley v. Dream Stone, Inc. et. al. had sued his former employers for wages due upon termination of employment: approximately $2000.00 of combined accrued vacation pay, and web design fees. “There were other, peripheral causes of action in the complaint, but the wage claim was the cornerstone of the civil action,” stated Buckley. “There was no way I could lose that. The Judge knew it, and the Defendants knew it.”
On June 17, 2010 Judge James Hartmann illegally, feloniously, in violation of C.R.S. 8-10-110(2), and in criminal conspiracy with the civil Defendants, stripped Buckley of the Due Process Right, and all evidence necessary to prosecute his wage claim. Buckley challenged the Jurisdiction of the Court to enter a ruling which was in violation of his Due Process Rights, and in violation of Colorado Statutory Law.
Hartmann ignored the challenge to the Court’s Jurisdiction, and bullied on. Hartmann than illegally forced Buckley to pay the Defendants’ fees for their response a Motion for which no fees were awarded.
Buckley had had enough. “That was it,” Buckley exclaimed. “I’d had enough of his corrupt psychopath Judge. He violated my Due Process rights, his rulings were in wild disregard for the law, and clearly everything he did was nothing more than a manifestation of his pure malice: his rulings were void.”
Buckley refused to submit to the Jurisdiction of James Hartmann’s Court for 3 reasons:
(1) Hartmann’s unlawful refusal to show proof of continuing jurisdiction on the record of the Court after Buckley had challenged the Court’s Jurisdiction.
(2) Hartmann’s illegal Orders, in violation of C.R.S. 8-4-110(2), stripping Buckley of both evidence, and the right to prosecute his Wage Claim in a Court which seemingly claimed Jurisdiction over the parties.
(3) Hartmann’s illegal Orders, in which he knowingly, feloniously, and with extreme malice allowed the civil Defendants to falsify an affidavit of Attorneys’ fees, and forced Buckley to pay fees for the Defendants’ Response to a Motion that no fees were awarded for.
Under the law, corrupt Weld County District Court Chief Judge James Hartmann surrendered Jurisdiction over Buckley’s District Court Wage Claim:
Judgment is a void judgment if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process, Fed Rules Civ. Proc., Rule 60(b)(4), 28 U.S.C.A.; U.S.C.A. Const Amend. 5. Klugh v. U.S., 620 F. Supp. 892 (D.S.C. 1985).
“Judge” James Hartmann surrendered Jurisdiction over Buckley’s Wage Claim case on June 17, 2010.
“Judge” James Hartmann perceived he dismissed Buckley’s case with prejudice on July 22, 2010.
In June 2013, the Weld County District Court, under the authority of District Court Chief Judge James Hartmann, raided Buckley’s home because he had refused to give the deed to his house to his former employers.
10 days later, Buckley’s home was raided again, and he was arrested for alleged, “Retaliation Against a Judge”, for supposed “threatening” statements he had made against James Hartmann during the first illegal raid.
“The (2014) trial was a sham,” states Buckley. “Congressman (then, Weld County DA) Ken Buck threatened my attorney, stating that if he did anything to embarrass him before the election, or the Judge (Hartmann), he would never practice law again.” Weld County sources corroborate the clandestine meeting between Congressman Ken Buck, and Buckley’s defense counsel, Denver attorney Michael Root.
The transcript proves Hartmann’s sworn testimony before the Boulder County District Court was rife with perjury. The fact that Boulder DA Stan Garnett had been in possession of evidence of the actual events prior to Buckley’s arrest, since 2011, proves Obstruction of Justice. Buckley demanded answers.
According to witnesses and the Official Court Transcript, In sworn testimony before the Boulder County District Court, James Hartmann testified that he had awarded the civil Defendants Attorneys’ Fees for their Response to Buckley’s Motion for Consolidation.
According to Buckley,”Oh, yeah. This fucker (Hartmann) raided my home, and had me thrown in jail because I refused to pay fees for the Motion for Consolidation. Than, they stole my $1000.00 bond money to force me to pay fees for the Consolidation Motion. There was no fucking way I was going to pay those assholes for the Motion for Consolidation, but evidently Hartmann and his band of thieves had other ideas”.
Weld County District Court records corroborate Buckley’s statement.
After Buckley was falsely convicted of retaliation, and had obtained a copy of the Court transcript, he immediately contacted Boulder County DA Stan Garnett via email, demanding proof corroborating James Hartmann’s known-perjured sworn testimony. Garnett’s July 15, 2014 response to Buckley’s demand is as follows:
Your requests and demands are rejected.
The problem? Although Buckley’s home was raided and his money was seized to pay for the Defendants Response to Motion for Consolidation, and Hartmann swore under oath that fees were awarded, NO FEES WERE AWARDED. 02.16.2010 J order denying P moton to consolidate cases Judge James Hartmann’s testimony constituted Perjury in the First Degree.
DA Stan Garnett, a member of the Colorado Bar, Officer of the Court, and public servant is bound not only by the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct, but also by his oath of office to seek Justice, and uphold the laws of this State, and the Constitution of the United States. DA Stan Garnett has illegally and knowingly suborned felony perjury, and Obstructed Justice to conceal the evidence when James Hartmann’s criminal act was brought to his attention. Stan Garnett is a criminal, unfit as a member of the Bar, and unfit to be a Colorado public servant.
Should DA Stan Garnett be removed from his official position and disbarred? The law says, “Yes”.
The Government of Colorado, with full knowledge of crime by Judge James Hartmann, Congressman Ken Buck, and Boulder District Attorney Stan Garnett should, rightfully, publicly release all transcripts related to the ongoing crimes of the aforementioned. The Government of Colorado with WILL, however continue to use our socioeconomic status to conceal evidence. We need (very expensive) transcripts. Please Donate!